How the world rulers are working & organizing behind our backs to build a new system, destroy our freedoms, grab nature for themselves and bring most of us into harsh poverty. By Katia Novella Miller

KBNBWorldNews tells you the truth, support it: click to make a secure donation with PayPal or your Credit or Debit Card. WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT

You can also make a bank transfer. IBAN: IT54I3608105138295587395590 – Bank Account Holder: Katia Novella – Reason: I support independent information

Leelo en ESPAÑOL – Leggilo in ITALIANO

What Is Awaiting Us? A Covid & Green Dystopia, a Totalitarian New Middle Ages

By Katia Novella Miller

SPECIAL REPORT/Long read. I want to start this report highlighting that the issue here is not whether global warming is true or false, but rather it focuses on the policies the establishments are implementing to bring the people of our planet into a totalitarian and dystopian new world order. An appalling revolution from above most of us is unaware of, that should horrify and outrage all of us and against which we all need to act firmly. There is no time to lose, it’s not a joke. Our situation requires an immediate opposition and action, as you will understand just in a few minutes if you keep reading this report.

In 2019, UK Fires published a report called Absolute Zero, produced by a collaboration between Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College of London universities, a plan to drastically reduce emissions to a net zero by 2050 in Great Britain. But even though its declared goal is only the United kingdom, in reality we can well consider it a plan for the whole world as James Corbett who spearheaded the Corbett Report has pointed out. As shown by the history of the dangers posed to human health by excessive sugar consumption, just to cite one case pertaining all of us, universities are not neutral social and cultural actors, but rather cohabit often with governmental interests and powerful economic capitals. No surprise therefore if due to Cambridge and Oxford Universities’ fame and high social status among institutions alike worldwide, this report allegedly made only for Great Britain can be considered a general plan that will be implemented all over the world. This does not mean that all world rulers will try to implement these structural social changes simultaneously, neither that all points described in this report will be wholly embraced by all countries, as social and economic realities differ significantly, nor that they won’t introduce little changes. Nevertheless it could be regarded as the master plan or a standard indicating the path to follow. Now let’s see what Absolute Zero contemplates.

Absolute Zero is phased in two stages, the first to be reached in 2030, the second and final in 2050.

It talks about our lives, our leisure time, the construction and energy sectors, like heating, electricity and housing, our food and agriculture, transportation, road vehicles, travel, tourism, manipulation and indoctrination of students; it suggests how to conduct the propaganda, how the government should proceed and much more.

Written in 2019, it plans, among many other things, that we stop flying, start to use the heating and energy less, electrify our heating and boilers with green energy, stop eating beef and lamb, buy small electric cars by 2050, travel mainly by train, refurbish our homes, reduce our consumption of energy by 40, 60%. It plans to constrain our movements, the dismantling of many economic sectors and also foresees the increase of housing prices. Preset political and economic policies that are already negatively impacting the lives of many us in the West and around the world.

Here I am going to present a summary of the most relevant points. Please take your own conclusions (if you can read in English I invite you to read the whole report and after, if you wish, jump to the second part of this article).

In the first part of this report you will see my comments between double parenthesis.

Table of Contents

PART I: Absolute Zero, the Master Plan

PART II: Are their eco-friendly technologies truly green? A big lie?

PART III: What’s really behind their green revolution? Covid passports and the greatest seizing of all nature

PART I

Absolute Zero, the Master Plan

Travelling: they say that “the impact of our travelling depends on how far we travel and how we do it. The most efficient way to travel is with a large number of people in a small vehicle and reduce our total annual mileage.” To reach this goal they suggest:

Stop using aeroplanes – ((we can wonder if all these covid digital restrictions and passports are designed also to reach this goal, that obviously won’t touch the very rich and powerful as they will be able and allowed to fly in their private planes)).
Take the train not the car when possible.
Use all the seats in the car or get a smaller one
Choose an electric car next time we buy one.
Lobby for more trains, no new roads, airport closure.

They keep saying: “Without flying, there will be growth in domestic and train-reach tourism and leisure.” ((Additionally they suggest that travelling can be substituted for example by digital travelling – welcome to the future!))

From 2030, “all airports in the UK except Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast, close with transfers by rail.” ((This means they want to close most airports!!!).

Aviation: “there are no options for zero-emissions flight in the time available for action, so the industry faces a rapid contraction.” ((They want to prohibit flying- for the masses obviously!!!))

Heating and appliances:

Use the boiler for less time, if possible, staying warm by only heating rooms if people are sitting in them, sealing up air gaps and adding insulation.
Wear warmer clothes in winter – ((interestingly, recently in front of the unaffordable bill’s price increase in the UK and the rest of Europe, one UK energy company have sent even a pair of socks to its customers inviting them to wear warmer clothes and turn their heating down creating outrage among people; and another company invited its clients to cuddle their pets to keep warm, it’s not a joke! Pure coincidence?))
Next time you replace the boiler, choose an electric air or ground-source heat pump if possible.
Lobby for zero-carbon building standards, means- tested support for housing retrofit and more renewable electricity.” ((Is this why governments are bankrolling green house renovations in many countries?))

“Rapid growth in demand for conversion to electric heat-pump based heating matched to improvements in insulation and air- tightness for building envelopes.”

“Most energy uses in buildings are for heating air (space) and water, mostly by combustion of gas in individual boilers in each building. Absolute zero emissions requires a complete electrification of energy uses in buildings. Although appliances and lighting are already electric, space and water heating must change.”

“However, the best use of heat pumps is with ducted air heating – which requires a more intrusive modification of a building, but saves more energy. Deploying heat pumps would almost double the demand for electricity in buildings from current levels, so further interventions to reduce the demand for heating are also important” – ((undoubtedly the current price increase of our bills is a good way to force people towards such solutions!))

“The cost of houses built to the Passive standard – which only use the sun for heating, and need electricity only for ventilation, lighting and appliances – is approximately 8-10% more than standard construction, and the thick walls required slightly reduce the available internal space, in return for zero energy bills.”

“All new builds (domestic, commercial and institutional) to be built to passive house standards by 2050; by 2050 this is 21% of the housing stock. All unimproved current buildings to be retrofitted with roof/attic insulation, and single to double glazing.”

“By 2030 electric heat pumps must replace gas boilers and building retrofits (air tightness, insulation and external shading) expand rapidly. By 2050 heating should powered on for 60% of today’s use.”

Electricity: “by 2030 wind and solar supplies should grow as rapidly as possible. By 2050 all non-electrical motors and heaters must be phased out.”

“All today’s heaters and appliances used 60% less, for example turning down thermostats, avoiding heating unoccupied rooms, and choosing smaller appliances.”

Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter… are trying to silence independent media fighting for the truth and a better world. Given this fact, it is extremely important for people to search out information for themselves, go directly to our website and others, subscribe to diverse email lists, and not rely on social media for information. Please enter your e-mail and click to subscribe to get our reports in your inbox

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Manufacturing: “by 2050 all conventional mortar and concrete phased out. Focus on retrofit and adaption of existing buildings. All energy supply will be by then non-emitting electricity.”

“By 2050 and beyond the product and composition of many manufacturing industries will be significantly different.”

Eating:

“Beef and lamb phased out by 2050 and replaced by greatly expanded demand for vegetarian food – ((or lab meat?)). Electricity supply for food processing and storage will be cut by 50%.”

“By 2030 National consumption of beef and lamb should drop by 50%, along with reduction in frozen ready meals and air-freighted food imports” – ((one would probably think: what a pity for the economies of countries like Argentina, but don’t worry, fortunately they are changing to other no less destructive activities like the extraction of lithium for the benefit of electric cars manufacturers!!!)). “By 2050 beef and lamb should be completely phased out, along with all imports not transported by train.”

“By 2050 total energy required to cook or transport food should also be reduced by 60%.”

Appliances: “by 2030 gas cookers should be phased out rapidly in favour of electric hobs and ovens. Fridges, freezers and washing machines become smaller. By 2050 electrification of all appliances and reduction in size to cut power requirement.”

Construction sector: “by 2050 cement and new steel should be completely phased out along with emitting plastics . Aluminium and paper should be reduced with energy supply. By 2050, we will have only very limited cementitious material and will use only recycled steel.”

“At present there is no alternative to the use of cement and so the construction industry has to radically change its production process or close.” ((Well, many people will be living on the streets!!!)).

“Buildings need to be reused rather than rebuilt. On the other hand, it is not clear how the existing stock of buildings will be maintained, and the conclusion is that building space (residential and commercial) will have an ever increasing premium.”. ((Increasing premium? They are already unafforbably skyrocketed for most of us!!! These people don’t care about us and our social wellbeing)).

“Any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt. This sort of response is clearly counter-productive“. ((So they have to stop the construction of new houses)).

Road vehicles: “the transition to electric cars is already well under-way. We already have targets for phasing out non electric vehicles, but by 2050 will have only 60% of the electricity required to power a fleet equivalent to that in use today. Therefore we will either use 60% fewer cars or they will be 60% the size. Development of auto-grade steels from recycling is a priority, and the need to control recycled metal quality may require changed models of ownership. The rapid expansion of lithium battery production may hit short-term supply constraints and create environmental concerns at end- of-life unless efficient recycling can be developed.”

“In 2029 development of petrol/diesel engines ends; any new vehicle introduced from 2030 must be compatible with Absolute Zero: all new vehicles electric, average size of cars reduces to ~1000kg.”

“By 2050 road use at 60% of 2020 levels – through reducing distance travelled or reducing vehicle weight.”

“If cars last on average for 15 years, then to ensure that all cars are electric in 2050, the last non-electric car must be sold no later than 2034.”

“Short distance travelling involves frequent stops and restarts, so a substantial share of energy is used to accelerate a vehicle and its contents. As a result, reducing the weight of the vehicle and travelling less become key strategies to reduce energy demand.”

“Demand reduction with today’s technologies: all vehicles cover 60% less distance, or with 60% more passengers/load per vehicle. Switch to rail: 10% of current passenger car journeys are made by rail.”

International freight: “we currently have no non-emitting freight ships, so there is an urgent need for exploration of means to electrify ship power, and options to transfer to electric rail. This would require an enormous expansion in international rail capacity.”

“Growth in domestic and international rail as substitute for flights and low-occupancy car travel. Rail becomes dominant mode for freight as shipping declines.”

“After 2050 all shipping declines to zero what means that all ship-based trade must be phased out by that year. Electric trains will become the preferred mode of travel for people and freight over all significant distance.”

We Need To Return To (The Real) Natural Law25 April 2024

Fossil fuel industries: “all coal, gas, and oil-fuel supply from extraction through the supply chain to retail must close within 30 years. By 2050 fossil fuels should be completed phased out.”

Steel: “by 2050 only recycled steel will be allowed.”

Ceramics: “the 60% constraint on available electricity implies a 60% constraint on ceramics production in 2050.”

Glass: “most current glass production uses natural gas-fired furnaces. These could be electrified, but a reduction in production would be required in proportion with the available supply of emissions-free electricity.”

Paper: “after complete electrification, paper production would be reduced by approximately 80% of current volumes.”

Education: on this topic, Absolute Zero reports a case of brain-washing and social-engineering at school in the UK: “In the 1970’s, British Steel saw an opportunity to expand their market for structural steel sections, by persuading UL clients and the construction supply chain to switch from concrete framed building to steel framed building. Instead of seeking Government support to subsidise or legislate to support this change, they instead developed high quality teaching material and supported the development of new courses in all major civil engineering degree courses about design with steel. As a result, the next generation of graduates entering the profession were equipped to use more steel, and expected it to be more normal practice”. ((This is, basically, what education is for in our social systems: it serves to create new needs and new visions imposed from above)).

The report goes on: “many schools already feel the need to keep heating temperatures low in an effort to make severely constrained budgets balance, which is a side-effect that could be standardised across the system to help establish the normality of lower-energy, lower-temperature heating setpoints. there are enormous opportunities in education which we could be embracing now to ensure that when the painful period of mitigation nears an end, we have an educated population ready to take advantage of the zero- carbon era. The opportunity in education spans from preparing for the restraint required to achieve Absolute Zero to preparing for the longer-term transformation of prosperity beyond 2050.”

“The wider problem with the changes in labour is knowing what type of labour or jobs will be in demand. Those who are starting secondary school now, in 2019, will be 43 in 2050. Thinking about what education is appropriate for a very different set of industries is a key question. Should we still be training airplane pilots? Or aeronautical engineers? How are we training architects, civil engineers? Education decisions are far more persistent than capital investments”. Undeniably, we are seeing these tendencies already in schools all over the world”
Absolute Zero

Reducing Demand: “purchasing of new buildings, infrastructure, vehicles, industrial equipment and large appliances is reduced to 60% of today’s levels” – ((this doesn’t mean eradicating poverty but augmenting it by diminishing the standard of life of the masses, right?)).

Action by Government:

Ensuring energy is cut in the aggregate requires an allocation mechanism, and the price of energy to reflect its scarcity” – ((are we not already feeling the price of energy?)). “In such a scenario, the owners of the means of production of renewable energy will make very large profits.”
Information alone is not sufficient to cause actual changes in behaviour, and we should be aware of lessons from behavioural science to maximise the effectiveness of information.
Meeting the net-zero emission targets will generate growth in some industries, but will also require the decline of others, this is likely to be met with resistance as those who benefit from the status quo resist change.

To bring to completion these aims, the Absolute Zero Report invites to take into consideration the experience of the The London Olympics. It “ highlighted the following key lessons that could be transferred to emissions targets:

Form a responsible body in government
Limit innovation to knowledge gaps to reduce risk
Maintain a unified cross party vision
Empower people, with the right skills

So when you start hearing on tv, in the news or journalists and politicians saying: “travel less distance and travel by train or in small (or full) electric cars and stop flying!”, “use the heating less and electrify the boiler” or “stop eating beef and lamb” it’s good that you know that these are just what they call – and this report calls – ‘key messages for individuals’. Just be aware!

One of the reasons why it can be difficult to identify the implementation of their ‘green plan’ around the world, is because they (the rulers) use other names, but the content and the goals are those.

WAIT, DON’T GO! Writing the truth is dangerous. If you value our hard work, please consider supporting our efforts sharing our article and with a donation (below). Supporting global independent media todays is supporting your freedom tomorrow. Furthermore we need your help to keep publishing what mainstream media hides to you and inform the global community, please support our hard work!

Make a secure DONATION with PayPal or your card

PART II

Are their eco-friendly technologies truly green?

Absolute Zero states that “apart from flying and shipping, all of our current uses of energy could be electrified”, what entails that the masses ((not the rich, who will be able to fly wherever they want in their private jets)), will have to say goodbye for good to travelling and to a lot of commodities and that all devices that run with other kinds of energy must be replaced. As we have seen, flying and shipping can’t be electrified so they will be phased out by 2050 and people will be compelled to electrify everything using green renewable technologies such as wind-turbines, solar-panels or electric cars, but are these ‘eco-friendly’ technologies truly clean and are them safe for living beings ? Sorry to shatter the illusions of some of you but the answer is an absolute NO.

Here we are going to see briefly just some the most popular new green technologies. However, it’s also fundamental that we understand that there are other reasons behind this shift from fossil fuels and stockbreeding. Yes, they say this shifting is needed because these substances and activities release too much CO2 (carbon dioxide) which is responsible of global warming. But did you know oil is becoming harder to find and extract?

“Finding oil and gas to replace the world’s fast dwindling reserves is increasingly risky as rigs probe areas once seen as too difficult or too dangerous, and costs are rocketing. The cost of discovering each new barrel of oil and gas has risen three-fold over the last decade as technology has pushed the frontiers of exploration into ever more remote areas. As old fields run dry, oil companies are drilling wells in some of the most inhospitable regions, where political, physical, geological, geographical, technical and contractual risks are high. Despite escalating challenges, the annual rate of discovery of new fields has remained remarkably constant at 15-20 billion barrels, more than enough to compensate for the loss of existing reserves that are declining at between 5 and 15 percent a year. But the cost of this success is staggering, and unless consumers pay more for oil in future, some analysts think we could face an energy supply crunch within a few years. The worry is that investment may be squeezed as risks rise, and that could bring us to a looming supply crunch”, wrote agency Reuters in 2010. And this is happening also in Russia, the top oil producer in 2021. According to Investopedia, Russia’s “crude output risks dropping 40 per cent over the next 15 years to about 6.8m barrels a day in 2035. West Siberia, which accounts for more than half the country’s crude, has seen output slide 10 per cent over the past decade because of depleted conventional reserves.” What about Saudi Arabia? In 2011, the Washington Post wrote: “global demand is growing too quickly, and the Saudis are running out of spare capacity.”

The situation is very similar for gas. “Our current boundless appetite for the stuff means that natural gas reserves could run out in about 50 years.”, wrote recently Ghana’s Ghextractives.com.

What all this means? Take your own conclusions. Unquestionably, if we understand the problems traditional car manufacturers are facing with oil, we can easily understand why they are shifting to electric cars, right?

Electric Cars

As we have seen Absolute Zero establishes that all non electric cars will be phased out by 2050 when there will be “only 60% of the electricity required to power a fleet equivalent to that in use today”. That surely indicates only few peope will own a car.

Currently, electric cars are expensive (they expect the price will be reduced in the future). Lithium batteries’ prices can be as well very high – in Finland some people have decided to blow their car instead of buying a new battery for € 17.000! Furthermore, in order to reduce the expenses of owning an electric car it is better to have your own garage where you can install an expensive changer. All this means these machines won’t be for the pockets of the vast majority.

Already the future of cars has been decided and agreed. “Jaguar plans to sell only electric cars from 2025, Volvo from 2030 and last week the British sportscar company Lotus said it would follow suit, selling only electric models from 2028. General Motors says it will make only electric vehicles by 2035, Ford that all vehicles sold in Europe will be electric by 2030 and VW that 70% of its sales will be electric by 2030.”, reported in BBC. “By 2025 20% of all new cars sold globally will be electric.That will leap to 40% by 2030, and by 2040 virtually every new car sold globally will be electric.” This is the plan, of course devoid of impact assessment.

What will happen when electric cars get stuck for hours in traffic jams or in the cold? Questions that have not been answered apparently.

We all know these cars will be powered by lithium batteries. But lithium mining is not eco-friendly (in reality nor the batteries themselves!) This mining activity contaminates drinking water (to produce a tone of lithium requires 2.000 liters of water), contaminates air and the environment. It’s bad for the land, it’s bad for animals, it’s bad for humans – and if you don’t care it’s just because we are sons of cultures that teach us to accept that there are always invisible expendables in far away lands. That’s the evil we are.

Lithium mining carries high environmental costs and entails high CO2 emissions. Chile, where they have been extracting the metal, uses two-thirds of the area’s fresh drinking water for its extraction, contaminating it and leaving people without water. Furthermore, it seems lithium causes nervous system disorders and lung damages.

“No one, not even within the industry, would deny that mining lithium causes enormous environmental damage. Companies create artificial lakes when flushing the metal out of underground brine reservoirs. The process uses vast amounts of water, so you end up with huge flooded areas where the lithium settles. Its extraction results in the destruction and contamination of the natural water system. Unique plants and animals lose access to groundwater and watering holes. There have also been reports of freshwater becoming salinated due to extensive acidic waste water during lithium mining”, told Melanie Müller, a raw materials expert to the German network Deutsche Welle.

“Lithium batteries manufacturing – is written in Absolute Zero – requires a wide range of metals, most of which only exist in nature at very low concentrations: cobalt is one of the most valuable and is currently essential to the stability and lifetime of batteries. If new car sales are to be completely electric within 5 years, we will need to make 50 million batteries by 2050, just in the UK.” The leading producer of cobalt is the Democratic Republic of Congo, a rich-mineral nation shaken up by environmental degradation, repression, corruption, land grabbing, poverty, turmoil and violence triggered by local and global economic interests and governments. It is also well known that children work and get exploited in cobalt mines.

What about recycling them? Lithium batteries contain also plastic, aluminum, steel, graphite, copper and nickel. The percentage of lithium in electric car batteries is low (5-7%) and during the recycling process, this lithium is lost. Today, less than 5% of lithium batteries are recycled at the end of their lives.

Solar panels

There are different types of solar-panels, and as always in our cruel and unequal hierachical capistalistic societies, pristine and premium quality for the richest and of lower quality for those who can’t afford to spend much. Not all of them contain the same materials, but listing most of them they are: anodized or powder coated aluminum, polysilicon or silicon, metal, glass, copper indium gallium selenide or boron, phosphorus, cadmium telluride, plastic, silver, lead, arsenic. Let’s take a closer look at some of them.

Cadmium telluride is highly toxic, it is considered safe once in use (are we sure?), but pose a challenge during the manufacture and disposal of cadmium solar cells.

Copper indium gallium selenide is toxic to the lungs but is used as the key compound in some thin film solar cells.

“Traditional silicon solar cells are considered safe, but the manufacturing of those cells does produce silicon tetrachloride – a highly toxic byproduct harmful to plants and animals. Manufacturers should take steps to reduce the amount of silicon tetrachloride that is released into the surrounding environment.”, advises Clean Energy Ideas website.

In addition, lead and cadmium are harmful to human health and the environment at high levels. Whilst arsenic is a known human carcinogen associated with skin, lung, bladder, kidney, and liver cancer. Then there is a waste as a huge problem. “By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects that up to 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have reached the end of their life, and that the world will be generating about 6 million metric tons of new solar e-waste annually. Some political areas and countries will try – I repeat TRY – to make a 100% recycling of solar panels a reality by 2050”, but will they? Currently recycling is a big issue in the United States “where various recyclers are selling second-hand solar panels with low quality control overseas to developing countries. And those countries typically don’t have regulations for electronics waste.” Another negative and deleterious factor to keep in mind, certainly not less important or grave, is that extraction of some of these materials, as for lithium, destroy the environment, drain the aquifers and endanger human and animal’s life. Now, knowing all this, can you honestly say that solar panels are clean, eco-friendly energy?

Wind turbines

Wind turbines have been presented to us as eco-friendly winners, but it seems they affect wild animals both directly, via collisions, as well as indirectly due to noise pollution, (low-frequency infrasound which turbines generate), habitat loss, and reduced survival or reproduction. Among the most impacted terrestrial and aerial wildlife are birds and bats, which by eating destructive insects provide billions of economic benefits each year and are vital to the agricultural sector. The impacts for bats seem terrible. “Mass bat die-offs can occur even when bats don’t strike wind turbine blades, because their lungs explode from the air pressure changes”, stated an article in Current Biology in 2008. A 2013 study predicted that the expansion of wind turbines in Canada over the next 10-15 years could lead to the killing of approximately 233,000 birds and displacement of 57,000 pairs annually. Another study found wind turbines kill an estimated 140,000 to 328,000 birds each year in the USA. It also is worth noting, that data from 2014 revealed that bird deaths from collisions with power lines in the US numbered 12 to 64 million.

Lincolnshire, Great Britain 2016. Photo by MIke Halliday.

Aquatic animals. Do you remember those photos of whales laying dead on the beaches of England, the Netherlands or Germany? Well, their deaths could have been provoked by wind turbines. “That area has the world’s biggest concentration of offshore wind turbines, and there is ample evidence that their acoustic pollution can interfere with whale communication and navigation” reported Cfact in 2016.

Land animals. In an article titled Are Wind Turbines Killing Innocent Goats? Discovery Magazine wrote that a Taiwanese farmer blamed the death of 400 goats on a nearby wind facility. “His claim is backed up by a local livestock inspector who said unusual sounds can impact animals’ appetite, growth and sleep. The farmer has stated that the goats had been unable to sleep and began losing weight prior to their deaths.”

“If turbines are, in fact, causing miscarriages and other reproductive problems in large animals”, goes on the article, “what could this mean for the health of pregnant women and women of child-bearing age living in close proximity to the turbines?”

The public has no answers, because governments have not required any scientific testing to prove that turbines are safe for humans or animals, despite the proliferation of massive wind projects.

“Mounting anecdotal evidence suggests a need for caution before building wind turbines in areas near wildlife, livestock, and people. While it’s too soon to conclude that turbines have caused the various health problems and fatalities in animals near industrial wind facilities, it is also dangerous to assume that wind turbines are safe for animals or humans living in close proximity.”

Recycling wind turbines. Most of the body of the wind turbine, namely the tower, is made of reinforced steel, and a zinc alloy. The generator, gearbox and electronic controls of steel, copper and several metal alloys. In contrast, the blades are made of glass fabric and carbon fiber infused with liquid plastic. This material gives the blades the special properties it needs to do its job.

“Currently, many wind farms dealing with how to scrap old blades are all doing the only thing they can, just letting them pile up”, honestly explains Semprius, an eco-friendly firm from the US.

Casper landfill, Wyoming, United States.

“Unfortunately, they’re hard to recycle. They’re made of a tough composite material which gives them the strength to withstand constant rotational speeds well over 100 miles per hour. As old turbines are decommissioned, turbine blades are piling up in wind turbine “graveyards”.”

They are difficult to recycle. “They have to be sawed down with a diamond-encrusted industrial saw into 3 pieces that are “small” enough to be strapped to a trailer. After they’ve been cut, these blades are buried up to 30ft under the ground, but there are so many turbines in a wind farms…” wrote Green Orbits in 2021.

“In Europe, where space is limited, and wind energy is more established, companies have taken to selling their old parts to customers in Latin America and Asia.”

Cell phones

On second thoughts, I would dare to say that mobile phones are the most important technology of this green revolution. You will understand why soon.

As many of us know, cobalt is a fundamental mineral in their production – as for electric cars. About 70% of cobalt comes from Congo, which should be a very rich country due to the global utility of its minerals. On the contrary, “according to UNICEF and Amnesty International, around 40,000 children are involved in cobalt mining in DRC where they make only $1 – $2 USD per day”, therefore cobalt is produced by child labor. Even if many phones come from China or South Korea, the chemical substance come from the Democratic Republic of Congo or Rwanda – two countries continuously in turmoil, please don’t believe by pure chance. Cobalt extraction, poisons groundwater and causes indigenous population displacement.

The problem here is that modern technologies, such as solar panels, drones, 3D printers, computers and smartphones, don’t work without what are known as critical raw materials which include cobalt and we need cobalt for the green transition they are driving us into, which in turn is quite clearly toxic.

Largest supply of critical raw materials in the European Union, 2017.

Knowing all this should be enough to understand that what they call green technologies are not eco-friendly at all; people will be exploited, humans and animals will suffer and die, environments will be polluted and destroyed – and the damage created in one point of our planet soon or later will affect and damage the environment you live in. Furthermore, it’s not hard to see that only corrupt, manipulative, greedy, unjust, ignorant, irresponsible and criminal people can be leading such a disguised transition calling it a green, sustainable, eco-friendly revolution.

Very likely at this point you are wondering what’s the link between our mobile phones and this disguised green technology. Well: have you noticed that many governments all over the world have called our vaccination pass, GREEN pass. It’s not a coincidence. It’s part of the big green plan.

To continue offering our reports in English and other languages, we are looking for volunteer collaborators for various tasks: writers, lawyers, English proofreaders, translators from English into Spanish and/or Italian and vice versa; translators to other languages, graphic designers, editorial assistants capable or willing to learn to work in a CMS environment and on social networks, IT geniuses, website designers. Get in touch with us!

PART III

What’s really behind their green revolution?

“90 trillion dollars in energy infrastructure investments will be endowed to save mother Earth”
James Corbett of Corbett Report

Social norms and individual behaviours. “There is a misalignment between the scale of actions recommended by government and those most commonly performed by individuals. Actions which can have a big effect, such as not flying, are being ignored in favour of small actions, such as not using plastic straws. This is enabling individuals to feel satisfied that they are ‘doing their bit’ without actually making the lifestyle changes required to meet the zero emissions target. If large scale social change is to be successful a new approach is needed. Focus should therefore be centred on expediting the evolution of new social norms.

The longevity of the challenge of reducing emissions, and the lack of immediate or even apparent consequences of small individual actions mean it is challenging to link them to the large-scale climate crisis. This allows individuals to make decisions which contrast with their desire to reduce emissions. Scientific description is not always the most effective means of communication, and language used to promote zero emissions should no longer focus on an ‘eco- friendly’ and ‘green’ lexicon, but rather candid descriptions of actions that appeal to human fulfilment”
Absolute Zero

“Yesterday’s #ID2020 is today’s Good Health Pass, is tomorrows Digital Identity for All”,
The GrayZone

In the US and Canada it is called Covid Health Passport, in the UK NHS Covid Pass, in the European Union GREEN pass. Its history brings us back to 2016, two years prior to the outbreak of Covid-19.

The project was launched in 2014 as a private and public association. In 2016 “Bill Gates’ Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), Microsoft, Accenture and the Rockefeller Foundation established” – in coordination with the United Nations – “a new consortium to provide digital ID certificates to infants when they receive their routine immunizations. They called it ID2020, incidentally naming it for the year that a global pandemic would be declared,” writes The GrayZone news website.

It is important to note, for all you who do not know, that Gavi, formally launched in january 2000, is a global vaccine alliance. It was founded by Bill & Melinda Gates with a 750 million dollar donation. Its principal members are the Gates, the World Health Organization, Unicef, the world biggest vaccine buyer, and the World Bank. The agenda of Gavi is described in essence – “In the definition of its goals it’s written that they are ‘improving markets’ health’ – not people’s health, that translates – investors maximize their investments and that poor countries can pay for the product.” Clear? “Gabi’s donors include the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Norway, Canada, Japan, the European Union.” Whitney Webb, a US-born journalist based in Chile recounts in an interesting interview in Spanish.

Now let’s go back to Covid passes.

“Partners in the 2016’s ID2020 initiative include the credit card giant Mastercard and Simprints, a biometric technology firm supported by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), traditionally they are a front organization for US intelligence” writes The GrayZone’s Jeremy Loffredo and Max Blumenthal in their investigative research Public health or private wealth? How digital vaccine passports pave way for unprecedented surveillance capitalism. From Whitney Webb we know that among the partners are also Accenture, Ideo-Org and Facebook.

Essentially “behind the push for digital vaccine passports is a coterie of supra-national neoliberal institutions guided by oligarchic tech industry donors. Mega-corporations, international finance institutions, and billionaire-backed private foundations have played a vital role in lobbying for and implementing digital immunity passports”.

“The burgeoning global health passport system has been coordinated under the umbrella of the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO)”, goes on The GrayZone news website news website.

“However, this institution is so intertwined with wealthy private interests it can hardly be characterized as a “public” health body.”

“The UN, like the World Health Organization (WHO), no longer works only with governments, it now works with private companies for private interests. In 2005 documents they say that the only role of national governments is to create an environment that allows the implementation of policies created by other groups, NGOs, private corporations or international institutions, such as the UN itself, or the World Economic Forum even”, explains Whitney Webb.

As we have seen, “chief among ID2020 private funders is the second wealthiest man in the world, Bill Gates, and his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which happens to be the second largest donor to the WHO” and founder of Gavi. Moreover “the Gates Foundation recently (2021) helped fund a WHO paper providing ‘implementation guidance‘ . It advocates and announces plans and strategies to ensure proof of vaccination certifications across the world. The authors – write Blumenthal and Loffredo in their report – crafted the paper alongside the Rockefeller Foundation and with guidance from several high-level representatives of the World Bank.”

“At the forefront of the shift to digital credentials is the World Economic Forum (WEF)” – infamously known for it’s Fourth Industrial Revolution. “On paper, the WEF (also known as the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation) is an NGO and think tank ‘committed to improving the state of the world’. In reality, it is an international network of some of the wealthiest and most influential people on the planet. The Forum positions itself as the thought leader of global capitalism”, reports The GrayZone.

“Partners of the World Economic Forum’s “Platform for a Good Digital Identity” include the biometric ID firm Accenture, Amazon, Barclays Bank, Deutsche Bank, HSBC Bank, Mastercard, the biometric technology firm Simprints, and the credit giant Visa” go on The GrayZone’s journalists.

“Furthermore, Microsoft, Eccenture and Ideo are all founding partners of the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution of the World Economic Forum. Among the partners we also have Deutsche Bank and others,” adds Whitney Webb. And it is evident, “the founders of ID2020Alliance have a very close link with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and global organizations like the UN.”

The GrayZone news website have pointed out that -ID2020, today’s COVID passes, have all been pioneered in India. “With support from Western capitalist outfits like the Gates Foundation and the World Bank, India has become the site of the world’s largest digital ID database, known as Aadhaar. Launched in January 2009, Aadhaar serves as a proof of identity and address to a whopping 1.3 billion Indians. The technology for this system was provided by none other than the French security firm IDEMIA, now working for the French government.”

“Aadhar digital ID system has wreaked havoc on the lives of India’s most vulnerable and stigmatized populations. In the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand, a wave of deaths took place in 2017 when impoverished citizens were cut off from government-subsidized food rations by the Aadhaar system. In several cases, aging widows were denied rice for several months because the system rejected their fingerprint scans.”

“Around the same time, three brothers died of starvation after they failed to properly register with Aadhaar and were subsequently denied rations for six months. The same cruel fate was visited on the Kumari family, which was unable to obtain an electronic Aadhaar ID, lost its ration card, and saw its 11-year-old daughter, Santoshi, die of hunger.”

“Many people in Jharkhand have been victims of similar deprivation of food entitlements during the last few months. The main reason is that Aadhaar-based biometric authentication is now compulsory in about 80% of ration shops in the state. According to Scroll, an Indian outlet, a random sample of 18 villages where biometric authentication was compulsory found that a staggering 37% of cardholders were unable to buy their food rations.”

“Besides making Aadhaar the key to obtaining government services, the Modi government has integrated data collected by Aadhar to establish a “360-degree database” that “automatically tracks when a citizen moves between cities, changes jobs, or buys a new property,” according to the Huffington Post.

“When Covid-19 first reached India in early 2020, Nilekani proposed employing Aadhar as the basis for an anti-Covid vaccination and tracking program. The system’s serial breaches of privacy even prompted some HIV-positive Indians to drop out of antiretroviral tratment programs that require the Aadhaar card. Though the Aadhaar is said to be voluntary, individuals with HIV have complained to Indian media that they were pressured into enrolling into the ID program, and had been threatened with the loss of medical services.” reacounts The GrayZone news website.

“The WEF conceded that the new digital system will not necessarily provide users with the liberation they have been promised: “the Fourth Industrial Revolution digital identity will determine what products, services, and information we can access – or, conversely, what is closed off to us– the WEF has stated” according to The GrayZone news website.

“From e-passports to digital wallets, online banking, and social media accounts, these new forms of digital identification will allow us to travel, conduct business, access financial and health records, stay connected, and much more, it’s written on the website. The entity that issues the digital card will have all the ability to monitor the data stored there.” In addition” there is an agreement between governments on the sharing of this data. A database about you “that follows you from cradle to the grave”, highlights Whitney Webb. [Visit for more information about ID2020 -you can find the goal of WEF’s Digital ID on page 10 of this document]

According to The GrayZone news website this is already happening in the ‘rich’ West. “Back in the US, Gates’ ID2020 campaign has collaborated with the organisations that are advancing a system that registers Americans’ vaccination status with the same corporation that calculates their financial credit score. To register their proof of vaccination, Illinois residents must turn to Experian, the world’s leading credit score service.”

All this should reveal to us what’s really underway in the whole world. Though things are clearly already unfolding very bad for the 99% of the world population, when we are ruled by the wrong people there is not limit to widespread wrongdoing: “one of the founders who helped design ID2020, Monique Jeanne Morrow”- recounts Whitney Webb –“ defined this digital ecosystem as FREEDOM AS A SERVICE in an article she published about her participation in the first ID2020 conference.”

FREEDOM AS A SERVICE, I think this concept contains the real and deep goal of Digital Identity. A nexus of private – public establishment want to control everything we do, where we go, how we use our money, what we buy, what we eat, who we talk with, and eventually very likely what we read, what we watch…. They want to decide who of us have the right to medical treatment, to food or should die. And who of us should be rewarded. We won’t be able to do anything without their approval, neither to seek refuge in nature to reconciling with ourselves and our Mother Earth as it seems they want to seize all natural habitats and their natural resources, trees, animals, minerals, water, forests, etc, only for themselves: incredible as it may sound, this is not an abstract crazy hypothesis living in my mind as already global policies and agreements in this direction are in the making, and they are part of this big GREEN plan.

The Greatest Seizing

“The idea of carbon capture and storage requires no new technology, as it could be developed by increasing the area of land committed to forestry or “afforestation”
Absolute Zero

“There are two key implications for how we live our lives: first, buildings will become much more expensive because the restrictions on building which generate substantial scarcities; second, transport will become much more expensive because the limits on air travel will generate excess demand for other forms of transport. By expensive, we mean the direct costs to an individual or firm, but also indirect costs in terms of reduced quality. We would expect these two substantial changes to lead to pressure on the amount of space any one individual uses, and also where people choose to live and work. This points to increased centralisation, with growth in cities”
Absolute Zero

”They are trying to merge climate change with Covid” explains Whitney Webb in a recommended interview by the Corbett Report.

“In September 2021 (the multilateral development banking system, the Rockefeller Foundation and) the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced it had developed a new asset class meant ‘to preserve and restore the natural assets that ultimately underpin the ability for there to be life on Earth’. In reality however it will be a new asset class that will put not just the natural world, but the processes underpinning all life, up for sale, under the guise of promoting “sustainability”. Called a Natural Asset Company, or NAC, the vehicle will allow for the formation of specialized corporations “that hold the rights to the ecosystem services produced on a given chunk of land, services like carbon sequestration or clean water.” These NACs will then maintain, manage and grow the natural assets they commodify, with the end of goal of maximizing the aspects of that natural asset that are deemed by the company to be profitable”, reported Webb last October.

Wall Street’s Takeover of Nature Advances with Launch of New Asset Class

“NACs will not only allow ecosystems to become financial assets, but the rights to ‘ecosystem services’, or the benefits people receive from nature as well. These include food production, tourism, clean water, biodiversity, pollination, carbon sequestration and much more.”

“With NACs, the NYSE and Intrinsic Exchange Group (IEG) are now putting the entire nature up for sale. While they assert that doing so will “transform our economy to one that is more equitable, resilient and sustainable”, it’s clear however, that the coming“owners” of nature and natural processes will be the only real beneficiaries.”

Webb explains how all this will work: “NACs first begin with the identification of a natural asset, such as a forest or lake, which is then quantified using specific protocols. Such protocols have already been developed by related groups like the Capitals Coalition, which is partnered with several of IEG’s partners as well as the World Economic Forum and various coalitions of multinational corporations. Then, a NAC is created and the structure of the company decides who has the rights to that natural asset’s productivity as well as the rights to decide how that natural asset is managed and governed. Lastly, a NAC is ‘converted’ into financial capital by launching an initial public offering on a stock exchange. The NAC and its employees, directors and owners are not necessarily the owners of the natural asset itself following this final step. Instead, as IEG notes, the NAC is merely the issuer while the potential buyers of the natural asset the NAC represents can include: institutional investors, private investors, individuals and institutions, corporations, sovereign wealth funds and multilateral development banks. Thus, asset management firms that essentially already own much of the world, like Blackrock, could thus become owners of soon-to-be monetized natural processes, natural resources and the very foundations of natural life itself.”

The objective “is really endless profit from natural processes and ecosystems that were previously deemed to be part of “the commons”, i.e. the cultural and natural resources accessible to all members of a society, including natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable earth. The ultimate goal of NACs is not sustainability or conservation – it is the financialization of nature, i.e. turning nature into a commodity that can be used to keep the current, corrupt Wall Street economy booming under the guise of protecting the environment and preventing its further degradation. Indeed, IEG makes this clear when they note that “the opportunity” of NACs lies not in their potential to improve environmental well-being or sustainability, but in the size of this new asset class, which they term “Nature’s Economy.”

“Indeed, while the asset classes of the current economy are value at approximately $512 trillion, the asset classes unlocked by NACs are significantly larger at $4,000 trillion (i.e. $4 quadrillion). Thus, NACs open up a new feeding ground for predatory Wall Street banks and financial institutions that will allow them to not just dominate the human economy, but the entire natural world. In the world currently being constructed by these and related entities, where even freedom is being re-framed not as a right but “a service,” the natural processes on which life depends are similarly being re-framed as assets, which will have owners. Those “owners” will ultimately have the right, in this system, to dictate who gets access to clean water, to clean air, to nature itself and at what cost.”

According to Cory Morningstar, an independent investigative journalist, “one of the other aims of creating “Nature’s Economy” and neatly packaging it for Wall Street via NACs is to drastically advance massive land grab efforts made by Wall Street and the oligarch class in recent years. This includes the recent land grabs made by Wall Street firms as well as billionaire “philanthropists” like Bill Gates during the COVID crisis. However, the land grabs facilitated through the development of NACs will largely target indigenous communities in the developing world.” An already underway policy and a tragedy for millions of indigenous people around the world as have been reported and denounced by Survival International.

And we know, they can start in the third world, with indigenous lands, but then they will come to the first.

“It is an inventory and control plan to control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all constructions, all means of production, all information, all energy, all education and all human beings in the world.” And all this is the enfolding of The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) which “was originally a UN agreement signed in 1992 by then President Bush and 178 other national leaders. But it – this green project – has its roots in the 70s. It came out in the United Nations in 1987 in the book Our Common Future, there the term sustainable development was first coined and formally given a definition. But this has its roots in prior meetings of the UN: in 1972 and 1976 was determined that privately own land is a threat to social equity.”

Behind our backs, because controlled media does not do its job and inform us of what is really going on, they are taking important steps to transform the system to our detriment and only in the benefit of a conglomerate club. For example last November an “industry-led and UN-convened” alliance of private banking and financial institutions announced plans at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) to overhaul the role of global and regional financial institutions, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as part of a broader plan to “transform” the global financial system and to further erode national sovereignty in the developing world.”

UN-Backed Banker Alliance Announces “Green” Plan to Transform the Global Financial System

As I highlighted in my report The Alarming Chinese Social Credit System and the Rise of Authoritarian Surveillance States in 2018, they can start in one place but the goal is the whole planet. Some assert the model they are following and unfolding is that used for the establishment of protected areas in the USA, like the Yosemite National Park, at the end of the 19^th century, through the expulsion of Native populations living there.

In summary, in the name of climate change, everywhere people will be forced out their lands and compelled to live in cities where extreme poverty will become the norm and where no free movement will be allowed. People’s minds, their perception of reality will be formed by the propaganda of the media and Internet’s algorithms and censorship. People will be completely under control through their Digital IDs thanks to cell phones, computers and the Internet technologies. And only a tiny bunch of very-rich people will own (and enjoy) all nature and all the goods of our Mother Earth. Yes it is Orwell’s 1984. And yes, it’s dystopia and it’s here now! Could our societies have expected something different after supporting tyrannies, disguised or blatant, for so many centuries?

Now the core question seems to be: can huge masses of people accept they have been lied to, become aware, analyse their old indoctrinated ideas and mindsets, change, take their lives in their hands and arm themselves with courage to create a shift into sympathetic and just societies?

In this article we are not talking about the nature of climate changes we are perceiving and seeing around us but of their agendas. However I consider it is extremely important to keep in mind science and particularly ‘official science’ is not only driven by the powerful but it’s also the outcome of ideologies. The establishments have been repeating to us that in “the last century or so, humans have been interfering with the planet’s energy balance, mainly through the burning of fossil fuels that add carbon dioxide to the air; that the level of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere has been rising consistently for decades and traps extra heat near Earth’s surface, causing temperatures to rise.” However, as our points of view on the issue are limited into a certain spectrum of thought, we should be aware the reasons of global warming – if it exists – could lay somewhere else. Some say the Earth has lived periods of extreme hot along the centuries for example. Personally I find very interesting Hopi’s perspective (the Hopi are a Native American nation) which I summarised in this question: what happens when you keep extracting, matter, minerals, gases, draining liquids, fresh and cool water from the entrails of the Earth?

While I think prohibited questions like this could bring us to new answers and visions, surely what we are living with COVID is bringing many people, entire societies into despair, economic collapse, inflation, recession and more inequality. This surely cannot be the part of the plan ! Or is it ?!!!?

“The large shifts in production will have concentrated impacts. Rural or more isolated communities are likely to be disproportionately affected. The largest distributional impact, however, is intergenerational: the cost of hitting Absolute Zero will be borne by the current generation”
Absolute Zero

“The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change”
Absolute Zero

“We must understand that this process of closing down economies is deliberated – in societies based on economic activities to do things and to survive”
Global Research

People’s resistance against these changes can deter politicians, their ‘armed forces’ and their masters in their goals. And can have the same effect, at least for a little while, opposition among politicians as has recently happened (for pure national interests and assessments I suppose) with the European Union proposal aiming to ban people to sell or rent their property if it can’t be refurbished to an absolute zero-emition-home; or with the recent inclusion of natural gas within EU list of acceptable green energies. But no doubt, they will keep smashing us!

We have only one way to stop all this criminal, cruel, unjust, arrogant, uncivilized nonsense. Truly by nature we all are equal sons of our Mother Earth.

Udo Ulfkotte, a well known German journalist and author, defined by Wikipedia as a ‘conspiracy theorist’ – probably all those who are critical of the system are aware of what Wikipedia is – three years before his mysterious death in 2017 published Journalists for hire. How the CIA buys the news in Germany (Gekaufte Journalisten, Wie Politiker, Geheimdienste und Hochfinanz Deutschlands Massenmedien lenken) a book currently censored in the English market but you can get the pdf here. In it Ulfkotte describes how they operate:

“Jean-Claude Juncker, long-time head of the Luxembourg government and now head of the European Commission, tells us how it works:

“We decide something, then we deposit it in the room and wait some time to see what happens. If there are no big cries and unrest, because most people do not understand what has been decided, then we will continue – step by step until there is NO chance to go back.”

AUTHOR. Katia Novella Miller is an independent writer and researcher interested in topics that she finds interesting and important for the common good of humanity. Her objectives are to seek the truth and to unmask our false sense of normality and reality. For more information go to About Us, if you would like to contact Katia: katianovellamiller@protonmail.com

Share this special report! ⬇︎

Make a secure DONATION with PayPal or your Debit or Credit Card

You can also make a bank transfer. IBAN: IT54I3608105138295587395590 – Bank Account Holder: Katia Novella – Reason: I support independent information

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Follow us! We are on the main social networks, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, VK and Telegram (KBNBWorld). You can also follow as on our new video channels: BitChute, UGETube or You Tube.

Cover image by Diana Balderrama. Published images are mostly taken from the Internet and considered public domain. If an image infringes copyrights please send an e-mail to kbnbworldnews@protonmail.com and it will be immediately removed.

KBNBWorldNews is a Non-Profit News Organization.

Contact with the editorial office: kbnbworldnews@protonmail.com

Media: Republishing Guidelines

About KBNBWorldNews